Bing Webmaster Tools AI Performance Report: How to Read It

Bing’s report shows a site which queries led Microsoft’s AI to cite it, something Google’s equivalent report does not give. What it counts, which assistants its citations come from and what it cannot tell you.

Published 27 October 2026 — Co-founder of DoGeo, SEO, GEO and content; led the inbound strategy for Kulturo and HeyTalent

Short answer

The AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools counts how often a site appears as a cited source in answers from Microsoft Copilot, in AI-generated summaries in Bing and in a selection of partner integrations. It shows total citations, cited pages, the grounding queries the AI used to retrieve each page and the day-by-day trend. Microsoft opened it as a public preview on 10 February 2026, and it measures citations, not clicks or visits. The generative AI report in Google Search Console gives impressions by page, country and device, but not the queries.

What is the AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools

Definition

The AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools is the part of Bing’s console that shows when a site is cited as a source in AI-generated answers: which pages, for which queries and how the figure changes over time. Microsoft opened it as a public preview on 10 February 2026.

For a business, the value of the report is that the figure comes from the search engine itself, not from an outside tool’s estimate. Microsoft presented it as an early step towards GEO tooling, generative engine optimization, inside Bing Webmaster Tools.

Which assistants the citations in Bing’s report come from

Coverage

Citations in Bing’s AI Performance report come from three surfaces, according to the Bing Webmaster Tools documentation consulted on 27 October 2026: Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated summaries in Bing and select partner AI integrations. Microsoft does not say which partners those are.

Because Microsoft does not name its partners, the report cannot be used to claim that it includes ChatGPT or any other specific assistant beyond Copilot and Bing. Reading it as “my citations across every assistant” overstates what it counts. The data is also aggregated across all surfaces, so it cannot attribute a citation to Copilot or to a particular partner either.

Bing states that the report only reflects content eligible for its index and that it respects what each site asks for in robots.txt. A page Bing cannot index does not appear, and before reading a zero it is worth checking whether AI crawlers can read the site.

What is a citation and what is a grounding query in Bing Webmaster Tools

Metrics

A citation is each time a page from the site is visibly shown as a source in an AI answer; a grounding query is the key phrase the AI used to retrieve that content. The report counts the two separately.

Report metricWhat it countsWhat it does not say
Total citationsTimes the site’s content is shown as a source in AI answers during the periodWhere in the answer it appears or how it is presented
Average cited pagesAverage number of unique pages from the site cited per day over the periodWhat role each page plays within an answer
Grounding queriesKey phrases the AI used to retrieve content that ended up cited, with their citationsThe full question the person typed
Page-level activityCitations for each URL on the site during the periodWhether that page is more important or ranks better
Sources: Bing Webmaster Tools documentation, “AI Performance in Bing Webmaster Tools”, consulted on 27 October 2026; Bing Webmaster Tools blog, 10 February 2026.

Grounding, in AI answers, is the web material the system uses to support and cite its response, according to Microsoft. Grounding queries are therefore the searches the AI runs, not the person’s: Bing groups them into short phrases, such as “solar energy” or “solar panels” in its own example, and warns that they are not full questions or prompts.

One grounding query can lead to several pages on the site, and one page can appear under several queries. Bing notes that the data is a sample of citation activity, so totals may not match between the pages view, the queries view and the chart.

How to read the AI Performance report step by step

Reading

Bing’s AI Performance report is read in four steps, from the general to the specific: open it on a fixed period, see which pages are cited, cross those pages with the queries that trigger them and compare periods. Each step answers a different question.

  1. 01 / ACCESS

    Step 1: add the site and open AI Performance

    The report sits inside Bing Webmaster Tools, under AI Performance for each site. A site already verified in Google Search Console can be imported from there, and Bing Webmaster Tools verifies it automatically. The period can be 7 days, 30 days, 3 months or a custom range.

  2. 02 / PAGES

    Step 2: see which pages the AI cites

    The pages view sorts URLs by number of citations and answers one specific question: which content Microsoft’s AI already uses as a reference. Bing warns that the order does not measure the page’s importance or its position in search.

  3. 03 / QUERIES

    Step 3: cross grounding queries with pages

    Selecting a grounding query shows which pages were cited for it; selecting a page shows which queries brought it into the answer. Only one of the two can be filtered at a time, and further cross-referencing means exporting to CSV or Excel. This is the view that shows which topics the AI associates with the brand and which it does not.

  4. 04 / TREND

    Step 4: compare the period with the previous one

    The timeline shows how citations change day by day, and the Compare option overlays an earlier period, such as the last 30 days against the 30 before. It helps observe whether citations change after a content update, but Bing warns that it does not explain the cause: demand, models and changes across the rest of the web all play a part.

What Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Topics Portfolio add

New in 2026

On 16 June 2026 Bing added four preview capabilities to the AI Performance report: Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare. On 13 October 2026 it added Topics Portfolio, in beta. The first three and the last one regroup grounding queries so they can be read by intent, by theme or by share.

  • Intents classifies each grounding query by intent (informational, commercial, navigational, research, local and others), to show what kind of answer the site is cited in.
  • Topics groups related queries into broader themes: in Bing’s example, “solar panels” and “residential solar installation” fall under Solar Energy.
  • Citation Share is the percentage of citations the site receives out of all citations shown for the same grounding query. It does not reveal which other sites hold the rest.
  • Topics Portfolio gives, for each theme, its approximate size in citations across all sites, how many sites are cited and the queries where other sites are cited and yours is not. It only appears when the site has enough data.

Bing describes Citation Share as an observational metric, not a ranking or a competitive scoreboard, and asks for Topics Portfolio figures to be treated as directional. How to calculate citation share outside Bing, with your own log of questions, is covered separately.

Bing’s AI report compared with Google’s generative AI report

Comparison

Bing and Google now offer two different AI reports: Bing counts citations and shows grounding queries; the generative AI performance report in Google Search Console counts impressions and has no queries dimension. Neither documents clicks from AI answers.

AttributeBing Webmaster Tools, AI PerformanceSearch Console, generative AI report
What it countsCitations: times a page is shown as a source in an AI answerImpressions: times a link to the site is shown in a generative AI feature
SurfacesMicrosoft Copilot, AI summaries in Bing and select partnersAI Overviews and AI Mode in Google Search
QueriesYes, as grounding queries grouped into short phrasesNo: groups by pages, countries, dates and devices
PagesCitations per URL and which queries lead to each oneImpressions per canonical URL
Available to every sitePublic preview since 10 February 2026Since 31 August 2026
Sources: Bing Webmaster Tools documentation and Search Console Help, consulted on 27 October 2026; Bing Webmaster Tools blog (10 February 2026) and Google Search Central blog (3 June 2026).

The practical difference is the queries. Google tells you which pages and countries a site appears for in its AI answers; Bing also tells you which phrases its AI used to retrieve it, which is the figure that points to what content to write or expand next.

What a real AI Performance report looks like: Kulturo’s citations

Data

Kulturo, a tech recruitment agency in Barcelona and a DoGeo client since January 2026, logged 11,800 AI citations in three months, from late July to October 2026, with an average of 16 cited pages, according to Kulturo’s AI performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools.

The 16 pages are the average cited pages metric, which Bing calculates as unique pages cited per day: Microsoft’s AI does not lean on a single Kulturo page but on several at once. The screenshot of the report, with the daily series for citations and cited pages, is in the Kulturo case study.

Citations do not say how many customers arrive, and Kulturo measures that another way: it receives around 7 qualified forms a month from people who say they found it by asking ChatGPT or Claude, according to Kulturo’s data as of 26 October 2026. The two figures are read together, but neither can be derived from the other.

What Bing’s AI Performance report does not measure

Limits

Bing’s AI Performance report does not measure clicks, visits or conversions: a citation means the content was shown as a source in an answer, not that anyone clicked. Nor does it capture every citation, because the data is an aggregated sample and very low activity may not surface.

The Bing Webmaster Tools documentation says so in as many words: “It does not represent traffic, clicks, or user engagement.”

The report does not explain why a page is cited either, and it shows no individual answers or exact prompts. What leads an assistant to pick one source over another is covered in how AI models choose their sources.

Beyond Copilot and Bing, where the provider gives sites no report, the technical way to measure is a robot log: a rule in the firewall or CDN that records, without blocking, visits from each provider’s robots, identified by user agent and verified by IP where the provider publishes its ranges. This is what DoGeo sets up for each client, with a count of which pages each robot visits and when.

Each type of robot says something different: the search or indexing robot, which pages enter the assistant’s index; the one that opens a page at a person’s request, that the assistant read it in a conversation; the training robot, only something about training.

Neither Bing’s report nor robot logs record what the assistant writes in its answer. That still takes a fixed set of questions asked every month.

Keep reading

Do you know which of your pages AI can already cite?

DoGeo checks whether Bing and AI assistants can read your site, which pages stand a chance of being cited and which queries you are missing. Leave your name, company, website and work email and we will reply with what we found.